Jurisprudence is the philosophy of positive laws

Jurisprudence is the philosophy of positive laws

Jurisprudence is the philosophy of positive laws

The statement “Jurisprudence is the philosophy of positive laws” refers to one of the major branches of jurisprudence that focuses on analyzing and understanding positive law, which consists of the laws created and enforced by governments or legal authorities. This philosophical study of positive laws delves into how laws are made, interpreted, and applied within a legal system, without necessarily questioning their moral content or whether they are “just” or “unjust.”

1. What is Positive Law?

  • Positive law refers to the body of laws that are laid down by a legitimate authority, such as a government or legislature. These are the formal, written laws that people in a society are expected to follow.
  • Positive law contrasts with natural law, which is based on moral principles or inherent human rights that are believed to exist independently of human-made laws.
  • Positive law is man-made and is enforceable by the state through sanctions, penalties, or rewards.

Example: Statutes like traffic laws, tax regulations, and criminal laws are examples of positive laws created by legislatures or regulatory bodies.

2. Jurisprudence as the Study of Positive Laws

  • Jurisprudence, when referred to as the philosophy of positive laws, studies the nature, structure, and functioning of laws as they are established by human authority. This branch of jurisprudence is often associated with legal positivism, which is a theory in jurisprudence that emphasizes that laws are valid not because they are moral, but because they are enacted by legitimate authority and accepted by society.

  • The philosophy of positive laws doesn’t concern itself with whether a law is morally right or wrong. Instead, it focuses on:

    • How laws are created: Who has the authority to make laws?
    • How laws function: How are they enforced and interpreted?
    • What makes laws valid: Is a law valid simply because it has been passed by the correct process?

3. Legal Positivism and Positive Laws

  • Legal positivism, a school of thought within jurisprudence, argues that laws are social constructs and should be understood based on their source (the authority that created them) rather than their moral value.
  • Key proponents like John Austin and H.L.A. Hart are associated with legal positivism. They believe that law is a system of commands issued by the sovereign and that the validity of a law depends on it being enacted by the proper authority through recognized procedures.

Example: According to legal positivism, a law mandating taxation is valid because it was created by a legitimate legislative body, even if some people consider it unfair. The validity of the law comes from the fact that it was properly enacted, not from its moral worth.

4. Jurisprudence Explains the Structure of Legal Systems

  • Jurisprudence, as the philosophy of positive law, examines how legal systems are structured. It looks at how laws are organized, how different parts of the legal system interact (such as courts, legislatures, and law enforcement), and how legal systems evolve.
  • It also explores how legal rules are applied to individuals and how legal institutions maintain order in society.

Example: The study of the constitutionality of laws, the hierarchy of courts, and the procedures for passing legislation all fall under the scope of jurisprudence as the philosophy of positive law.

5. Separation of Law and Morality

  • A key aspect of the philosophy of positive law is the separation between law and morality. Legal positivists argue that a law can be valid even if it is immoral or unjust. This is because the legitimacy of a law depends on its source, not its moral content.
  • This doesn’t mean that positivists endorse immoral laws; rather, they believe that the validity of a law should be judged independently of its morality. If a law is unjust, they argue that the solution is to change the law through the legal process, not to deny its validity.

Example: In the apartheid era in South Africa, the law enforced racial segregation, which was widely considered immoral. However, under legal positivism, these laws were still seen as valid because they were enacted through the proper legal process, even though they were morally wrong. The moral debate about these laws was separate from their legal validity.

6. Criticism and Limits of Positive Law Jurisprudence

  • While jurisprudence focused on positive law is essential for understanding the operation of legal systems, critics argue that it neglects the moral dimensions of law. Opponents of legal positivism argue that laws should be evaluated based on justice and morality, not just their source.
  • Critics like Ronald Dworkin have contended that moral principles are intrinsic to the law and cannot be separated. For them, jurisprudence should not only study how laws are made and applied but also whether those laws are just.

Conclusion: Jurisprudence as the Philosophy of Positive Law

To summarize, jurisprudence as the philosophy of positive laws focuses on understanding and analyzing laws that are created by human authorities. It explores how laws are made, how they function, and what gives them legitimacy. This form of jurisprudence, particularly under legal positivism, is less concerned with whether laws are just or moral and more focused on their legal validity and enforceability within a structured legal system.

You May Also Like:

You May Also Like:

Jurisprudence Notes:

Relationship between Law and Morals

Difference between Austin and Kelson

Jurisprudence is eye of law

Constitution Notes:

Euthanasia in India, Right to die with Dignity

Right to Privacy Case Law Mr. X vs. Hospital Z

Short Note on Secular State

Federal Constitution Definition and key points

University of Madras vs. Shantabai,1954: Article 12 Case Law

Article 20 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 19 Fundamental Right of Indian Constitution with 10 Case Laws

Article 358, 359 Fundamental rights during emergency

Parliamentary Privileges and Fundamental Rights with Case Laws

Article 14 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 15 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 12 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

 

Criminology Notes:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS TORT | APPLICATION OF TORT LAW

STAGES OF CRIME AND LIABILITY

Crimes without Mens Rea? Statute without Mens Rea.

Definition of crime by various jurists, Criminology

Methods of Studying Criminology

All about Capital Punishment with Case Laws

Is Criminology a Science?

IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT | ATTEMPT VS IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT

Difference between Preparation and Attempt

Tests to Determine Attempt and preparation | With Case Laws

Difference between intention and motive | In Tabular Format

Judicial Process Notes:

What is Judicial Process?

Forms of Judicial Process: Adversarial & Inquisitorial

Doctrine of Precedent

Human Rights Notes:

UDHR Notes: History of UDHR

IPC Notes:

STAGES OF CRIME AND LIABILITY

Crimes without Mens Rea? Statute without Mens Rea.

IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT | ATTEMPT VS IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT

Mistake of Fact Vs. Mistake of Law | Sec. 76 of IPC

Other IPC Quiz:

Indian Penal Code MCQs Quiz: Section 1 to 5

Indian Panel Code MCQs Quiz on Section 511 and Attempt

IPC MCQs Quiz on Sec. 76 and Sec. 79 | Quiz on Mistake

Practice IPC MCQs online for free (Section 78)

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 81 MCQs | Necessity

Practice IPC MCQs online for free : Infancy (section 82-83)

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 81 MCQs | Necessity

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 84 MCQs | Insanity

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | IPC Section 85 MCQs | Intoxication

Law of Torts Notes:

Difference between tort and crime | Previous Notes

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS TORT | APPLICATION OF TORT LAW

Economic Tort | Business Tort: Application of Tort Law

Difference between intention and motive | In Tabular Format

Bolam Test | Bolam V. Friern Hospital Committee | Medical Negligence

Jacob Mathew V. State of Punjab Case Law | Medical Negligence

Medical Negligence in tort | Case Laws

Contributory Negligence | Law of Tort | Case Laws

Essential conditions of liability for negligence | Negligence in torts

 

LL.M Previous Year Papers:

Specific Principles of Criminal Law | LLM Previous Year Paper 2024 | CCSU

Specific Torts | LLM 4th Semester Previous Year Paper 2024 | CCSU

History and Basic Principles of Criminal Law | Previous Paper 2023

LLM Previous Year Paper 2023 | PRIVILEGED CLASS DEVIANCE

PENOLOGY PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER | LLM | CCSU

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Legal Education & Research Methodology

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Jurisprudence-I Download Now!

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Indian Constitution! Download Now!

LLB Previous Year Papers:

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Constitutional Law II | CCSU

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Legal and Constitutional History | CCSU

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Jurisprudence II | CCSU

LLB Hindu Law Previous Year Paper 2023 | CCSU

LLB Hindu Law Previous Year Paper 2024| CCSU

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version