Kelson's Pure Theory of Law

Kelson’s Pure Theory of Law

Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law

Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law aims to describe and analyze law independently of moral, political, or social influences. This approach is often called a “positivist” theory, focusing on what the law is rather than what it ought to be. Here are the key principles of Kelsen’s theory:

1. Law as a Normative System

Kelsen defines law as a system of norms or rules that dictate certain behaviors or obligations. Each legal rule is a norm that prescribes what ought to happen if certain conditions are met, such as penalties for certain actions.

2. The Separation of Law and Morality

Kelsen emphasizes a clear distinction between law and morality. For him, the validity of a legal norm does not depend on its moral value. A law can be valid even if it’s morally questionable, as long as it is part of the legal order.

3. The Basic Norm (Grundnorm)

The Grundnorm or “basic norm” is a hypothetical fundamental norm from which all other norms in a legal system derive their authority. This basic norm provides the foundation for the validity of all other legal norms within a given legal system, though it is itself not derived from any other norm within that system.

4. Hierarchy of Norms

Kelsen proposes a hierarchical structure of norms where lower-level norms (such as statutes) derive their validity from higher-level norms (such as constitutions). This structure ensures that the entire legal system is grounded in the Grundnorm.

5. Law as Science

Kelsen views legal science as a way to objectively study law as a normative system, much like the natural sciences study the physical world. He believed law could be studied “purely,” without influence from external factors like politics or sociology.

6. No Room for Subjective Interpretation

In his pure theory, Kelsen argues that legal interpretation should be as objective as possible, avoiding subjective values or the interpreter’s personal beliefs. Legal science should focus on describing and interpreting the law, not judging it.

Summary

Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law provides a systematic way to understand law strictly as an autonomous field, free from external ethical, political, or social considerations. This approach had a profound impact on legal theory, especially in shaping the study of law as a normative science.

You May Also Like:

You May Also Like:

Jurisprudence Notes:

Relationship between Law and Morals

Difference between Austin and Kelson

Jurisprudence is eye of law

Constitution Notes:

Euthanasia in India, Right to die with Dignity

Right to Privacy Case Law Mr. X vs. Hospital Z

Short Note on Secular State

Federal Constitution Definition and key points

University of Madras vs. Shantabai,1954: Article 12 Case Law

Article 20 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 19 Fundamental Right of Indian Constitution with 10 Case Laws

Article 358, 359 Fundamental rights during emergency

Parliamentary Privileges and Fundamental Rights with Case Laws

Article 14 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 15 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

Article 12 Fundamental Right with Case Laws

 

Criminology Notes:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS TORT | APPLICATION OF TORT LAW

STAGES OF CRIME AND LIABILITY

Crimes without Mens Rea? Statute without Mens Rea.

Definition of crime by various jurists, Criminology

Methods of Studying Criminology

All about Capital Punishment with Case Laws

Is Criminology a Science?

IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT | ATTEMPT VS IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT

Difference between Preparation and Attempt

Tests to Determine Attempt and preparation | With Case Laws

Difference between intention and motive | In Tabular Format

Judicial Process Notes:

What is Judicial Process?

Forms of Judicial Process: Adversarial & Inquisitorial

Doctrine of Precedent

Human Rights Notes:

UDHR Notes: History of UDHR

IPC Notes:

STAGES OF CRIME AND LIABILITY

Crimes without Mens Rea? Statute without Mens Rea.

IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT | ATTEMPT VS IMPOSSIBLE ATTEMPT

Mistake of Fact Vs. Mistake of Law | Sec. 76 of IPC

Other IPC Quiz:

Indian Penal Code MCQs Quiz: Section 1 to 5

Indian Panel Code MCQs Quiz on Section 511 and Attempt

IPC MCQs Quiz on Sec. 76 and Sec. 79 | Quiz on Mistake

Practice IPC MCQs online for free (Section 78)

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 81 MCQs | Necessity

Practice IPC MCQs online for free : Infancy (section 82-83)

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 81 MCQs | Necessity

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | Section 84 MCQs | Insanity

Practice IPC MCQs Quiz for free | IPC Section 85 MCQs | Intoxication

Law of Torts Notes:

Difference between tort and crime | Previous Notes

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS TORT | APPLICATION OF TORT LAW

Economic Tort | Business Tort: Application of Tort Law

Difference between intention and motive | In Tabular Format

Bolam Test | Bolam V. Friern Hospital Committee | Medical Negligence

Jacob Mathew V. State of Punjab Case Law | Medical Negligence

Medical Negligence in tort | Case Laws

Contributory Negligence | Law of Tort | Case Laws

Essential conditions of liability for negligence | Negligence in torts

 

LL.M Previous Year Papers:

Specific Principles of Criminal Law | LLM Previous Year Paper 2024 | CCSU

Specific Torts | LLM 4th Semester Previous Year Paper 2024 | CCSU

History and Basic Principles of Criminal Law | Previous Paper 2023

LLM Previous Year Paper 2023 | PRIVILEGED CLASS DEVIANCE

PENOLOGY PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER | LLM | CCSU

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Legal Education & Research Methodology

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Jurisprudence-I Download Now!

LL.M Previous Year Paper 2023: Indian Constitution! Download Now!

LLB Previous Year Papers:

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Constitutional Law II | CCSU

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Legal and Constitutional History | CCSU

LLB Previous Year Paper 2023 | Jurisprudence II | CCSU

LLB Hindu Law Previous Year Paper 2023 | CCSU

LLB Hindu Law Previous Year Paper 2024| CCSU

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version